THE
CIRCUS
IS
BACK
IN
TOWN
!
report by Rachel
Le Goff
What
the "Old Fogey" says ...
"Chris
Ofili, who's he?" ask this year's finalists. "Oh, you mean that stuffy
old master, the one who actually paints?". For what does painting
or any semblance to accepted art forms have to do with the Turner Prize
indeed. This year the British public are being told that washing
machines disguised as cameras and teenage pornography is "ART".
Jane
and Louise Wilson ,Tracey Emin , Steve McQueen , and Steven Pippin are
the finalists this year and not a painter among them. We are wondering
if they should not take the name of Britain's greatest ever painter J.M.W.
Turner out of the "Turner Prize" and call it the "Tate Prize" instead.
Has it not become an insult to the memory of Turner?
The
exhibition opened to the usual controversy. Tracey Emin's exhibit (we refrain
from using the term 'work of art') seems to be a personal statement of
her exciting social life. It consists of a rumpled bed decorated with soiled
condoms, champagne corks and dirty underwear.
We
are then subjected to an explicit video tape of tawdry teenage sex
supposedly of Tracey aged fourteen having fun the British way "by the sea".
This exhibit falls clearly in the school of "Saatchi
Sensationalism" and has predictably stirred the most criticism
amongst viewers. What will this Hirst-led Y.B.A. movement become known
as in years to come? Saatchism? School of Saatchi?
Stephen
Pippin is the inventor of the 'camera obscura' washing machine which produces
foggy images that no doubt some paid critic will elucidate us upon. Carrying
through the hackneyed theme of photographic and video media are the Wilson
twins who sat down and went through National Geographic magazines till
they hit upon two American locations, Hoover Dam and Las Vegas casinos
as appropriate victims. Tate visitors will muse upon these highly esoteric
American cultural institutions viewed on giant video screens. In
a fit of "America envy" the twins seem to say why don't we have such
meaningful, beautiful spaces in Britain? If they team up with Emin the
two exhibits could read, "Blackpool the Las Vegas of the British Isles".
By
now you are yawning at the tedium of yet more film media when you
arrive at Steve McQueen's silent film tribute to Buster Keaton.
Tate
director Stephen Deuchar in charge of Turner Prize propaganda has said
"It's a brilliant exhibition -- but of course it is not an objective or
rounded selection."
We
invite our British readers who bother to visit the Turner Prize circus
to send us your reactions. We ask you to send in your 'gut reaction' not
an informed one after you have studied the pamphlet or catalogue.
contact
from
our own ex-Courtauld Old Fogey correspondent in London on the Turner Prize
1999
|
AND
THE WINNER IS....Steve
McQueen's most popular work " Deadpan " is a direct reference to the work
of Hollywood legend Buster Keaton. Now
crowned the prince of cutting edge British art
|
McQUEEN
the artist
Film-maker Steve McQueen beat hot favourite TRACEY EMIN and we say "Thank
Heavens!" - for at least we won't have to look at Tracey's grungy bed and
knickers anymore. Let her take it to Christie's auction house and some
feeble minded executive will probably pay much more for it than the Turner
prize is worth. But will he have to call Tracey up every time he wants
his bed made?
McQueen is a film maker who went to all the right art schools, which
the Tate jury seem to like.
McQUEEN EXPLAINED
As ARTnewspaper.com cannot remain impartial we will instead quote
three critics below : two in favour of McQueen and the Turner Prize
and one who is against. Perhaps it will explain what exactly McQueen did
that led a posse of art critics and curators to feel he is worthy of the
prize. Normally in an art prize we could reproduce the image on
ARTnewspaper.com but as it is in video form, we can only present this verbal
description.
The prize jury awarded McQueen the award for the
"poetry and clarity of his vision, the range of his work,
its emotional intensity and economy of means".
The jury, chaired by Tate director Sir Nicholas Serota, was also excited
by his "continuing intellectual and technical evolution". McQueen was presented
with the prize by architect Zaha Hadid. Channel 4, which has sponsored
the award since 1991, also announced that it will continue its support
for three more years.
THE McQUEEN FILMS
'PREY' : films a tape recorder playing the sound of tap dancing
which later drifts off beneath a balloon
'DEADPAN': a recreation of a well known Buster Keaton silent
movie stunt in which a building front collapses, falling around him.
TWO CRITICS EXPLAIN
Richard Cork, art critic for The Times explains
the qualities he sees in McQueen's'DEADPAN' and 'PREY':
"Deadpan, the most widely admired of
his exhibits in the 1999 Turner Prize exhibition, takes, as its starting-point,
a Buster Keaton stunt from a 1928 film called Steamboat Bill Jr.
The relentless downward movement of Deadpan is
reversed in his new film, Prey. It looks earthbound at first, as an anonymous
hand switches on a two-spool tape machine resting in the grass.
After Deadpan’s arresting silence, the sound
of tap dancing comes as a shock. And just as we begin to wonder why McQueen
fastens up the tape, the entire machine is suddenly hoisted into the air
by a white balloon.
With dizzying speed the grass becomes open fields,
and then we find ourselves surrounded by sky as the balloon takes its strange
cargo higher and higher.
The unlikely sound of airborne tap dancing grows
faint, as the machine threatens to vanish in the void. But it never quite
disappears, and in the end plummets back to the ground with an inconsequential
bump. We should be left with a feeling of bathos. Against the odds, though,
Prey generates a lasting sense of suspended exhilaration.
Just as Emin asserts her undaunted determination
to keep on dancing, McQueen affirms the artist’s insistence on letting
the imagination take flight."
It is perhaps a testament to Keaton’s skill, that
suggests McQueen’s recreation of the familiar stunt remains thrilling.
Luke McKernan of The British Film Institute elucidates
further on 'DEADPAN':
"Without the benefit of sound, the star
had to create visual images which
would “linger in the mind.
McQueen uses himself as the absurd yet resilient
figure who makes no attempt to escape from a falling house. He fills the
end wall with Deadpan, making viewers feel that the house is descending
on them as well.
It pitches forward with frightening speed and
heaviness, accentuated by McQueen’s decision to film the event from several
different vantages.
Repeating the fall serves to increase our respect
for the man who defies it.
He knows that the blank window will save him,
by passing neatly over his head and crashing at his feet. But his refusal
to do anything except blink still seems laudable, and the film terminates
with McQueen’s steady, impassive face staring out stoically from the screen.
Without indulging in Hollywood heroics, he seems
braced to endure adversity with calm, stubborn resolve."
Accepting his award, Mr McQueen made a very brief speech, saying:
"I would like to thank my family and friends who are here tonight ... that's
it really." |
London Art Critic DAVID
LEE, expresses the majority opinion against The Turner Prize
"Given the blanket coverage roused by
beaten front-runner Tracey Emin’s in-yer-face stubborn stains, it is an
irony that the prize should have gone to an artist who avoided publicity
and let his work speak for itself...but that is where the problem starts.
McQueen is neither better nor worse than
many artists who try their hand at a spot of video, which means that his
films are laughably pretentious and even more typical of the genre in that
they take an eternity to impart nothing worth hearing.
His much discussed and praised piece based on
Buster Keaton is as flagrant an example of plagiarism as you will find
in any art gallery and succeeds only in polluting the memory of a comic
masterpiece.
McQueen’s two other entries are unwatchable for
those raised on the efforts of professional filmmakers, to the extent that
one wonders what qualities the adjudicators perceived in them. The judges’
bluster about Epoetry and the other all-purpose drivel they trotted out
in defence of their choice is unhelpful to those of us who remain bewildered.
It would have been educative for the entire nation
to have been flies on the wall of the Tate director’s office when the judges
were deliberating.
We would have learned the criteria used for judging
such work and not have had to take on trust the mindles paeans uttered
by those snake oil salesmen from the Tate’s Department of Interpretation.
As it is we are none the wiser. Is it art? It might be but it does not
look like it to me because McQueen’s work is so visually unexacting and
fails to add up to more than the sum of its parts, which surely always
plays a prominent part in good art.
It is in no sense visually alluring, beautiful
or memorable and, in the end, we must take it on trust, like the blind
faith of starry-eyed disciples, that the experts are right in proclaiming
his films to be the acme of accomplishment in contemporary British art.
Unless, of course, we choose to be impertinent and ask for a second opinion."
|
The
Turner Prize is awarded to a British artist under 50 for an outstanding
exhibition or other presentation of their work in the twelve months
preceding 16 May 1999. The Prize was established in 1984 by the Tate Gallery's
Patrons of New Art and is intended to promote public discussion of new
developments in contemporary British art. It is widely recognized as one
of the most important and prestigious awards for the visual arts in Europe.
The shortlisted artists are:
Tracey
Emin for her exhibitions in New York and Japan in
which she continued to show her versatility across a wide range of media,
her vibrancy and flair for self-expression.
Steven
Pippin for his exhibition Laundromat-Locomotion in San
Francisco and Philadelphia in which he transformed twelve laundry
machines into cameras in an ambitious experiment exploring the relationship
between vision and motion through photography.
Jane
& Louise Wilson for their exhibition Gamma at the
Lisson Gallery which revealed the wit, intelligence and drama of
their work in video, sculpture and photography.
The winner of the £20,000 prize will be announced at the Tate Gallery
on 30 November 1999 during a live broadcast by Channel 4. Work by the shortlisted
artists will be shown in an exhibition at the Tate Gallery from 20 October
1999 until 6 February 2000.
The members of the 1999 Turner Prize Jury are: Bernhard Burgi, Director
of the Kunsthalle, Zurich; Sacha Craddock, writer and critic; Judith Nesbitt,
Head of Programming, Whitechapel Art Gallery; Alice Rawsthorn, representative
of the Patrons of New Art; Nicholas Serota, Director of the Tate Gallery
and Chairman of the Jury.
Pillow-fight at Tracy Emin's
Bed at The Tate Gallery
"My Bed"
by Tracey Emin.
Two Chinese performance artists jumped at Tracey Emin's unmade bed
at the Tate Gallery on Sunday to have a pillow fight. We suspect it
may all have been a publicity stunt from the artist's own spin doctors.
The
two men, Jian JunXi, 37, and Yuan Cai, 43, distributed leaflets advertising
their intention to perform on the bed, then leapt upon it at 1pm and began
to assault each other with pillows until they were apprehended by staff
of the Art Museum. It is not reported if they were charged with vandalizing
a "work of art" - we doubt anyone would have the nerve. In America you
cannot charge anyone with the felony of damaging a work of art in a public
gallery unless the work is valued over $1,500.
Apparently it took Emin five hours to re-create her "master piece"
with the help of the curators putting back her soiled sheets in the proper
disorder but we noticed some 'before' and 'after' differences.

|
READ
MORE ON THE TURNER PRIZE
Young
British Art: The Saatchi Decade
|